In light of ongoing anti-monopoly cases, a director's realization of chat history being active underscores Google’s struggles with internal communications during legal scrutiny.
The evidence of internal communications being destroyed or concealed led a federal judge to suggest that crucial evidence is likely missing, raising concerns about Google's cooperation.
Court judges have explicitly criticized Google for allegedly lying and hiding critical evidence, showcasing the severity of the situation regarding their legal obligations.
Despite Google asserting compliance with preservation laws, judges remain skeptical, emphasizing the consequences of the company's approach to handling evidence in legal cases.
Collection
[
|
...
]