In a legal maneuver reminiscent of Trump, Sean Combs' defense team is invoking First Amendment rights to counter claims of obstructing justice during his sex-trafficking trial.
Combs' lawyers argue that his public statements are protected, citing a December ruling in Trump's election interference case, emphasizing broad rights for criminal defendants.
Prosecutors argue Combs' efforts in jail are not protected speech, highlighting that communication methods to arrange PR efforts extend beyond mere free speech.
The defense asserts that Combs' reputation has been irreparably damaged by a campaign of false claims, insisting he has the right to publicly defend himself.
Collection
[
|
...
]