This unique trial presents an unexpected challenge, as the jury pool may heavily consist of those who do not use the subway regularly, skewing perceptions of urban transit issues.
The self-selection of workers can inadvertently create a jury that doesn't fully understand the dynamics of subway commutes, which is central to this case.
Judge Wiley's consideration of jurors' financial situations highlights how socioeconomic factors can influence jury makeup, potentially impacting the outcome of high-profile trials.
As the trial unfolds, the implications of a jury comprised mainly of those who are less familiar with daily subway life could prove to be significant.
Collection
[
|
...
]