Coleen Rooney has claimed she ran up a legal bill totalling more than 1.8m from her high-profile libel battle with Rebekah Vardy, the high court has been told. The Wagatha Christie case has raised considerable attention due to its implications within the celebrity world, showing how personal disputes can escalate into major legal battles. It highlights the financial and emotional burden involved in such litigation.
In October 2022, the judge ordered Vardy to pay 90% of Rooney's legal costs, indicating a significant judicial opinion on the merits of the case. However, the ongoing dispute over the costs demonstrates the complexities and claims that can emerge even after a final ruling. This reflects broader issues around legal fees and accountability in high-profile celebrity cases.
The costs dispute has been rendered particularly intractable by the sheer magnitude of the costs claimed by Mrs Rooney, in absolute terms and when compared to her agreed costs budget. This remark made by Jamie Carpenter KC reveals the challenges faced in reconciling expected costs with actual claims, showcasing a broader trend of excessive legal fees in high-stakes litigation.
Mr. Carpenter criticized Mrs. Rooney's legal bill for its substantial charges, claiming it included costs for luxuries such as stays at luxury hotels and excessive dining costs. He described the approach to costing as 'kitchen sink,' suggesting a lack of scrutiny in justifying expenses. This paints a picture of how the high-profile nature of cases can lead to inflated legal fees.
Collection
[
|
...
]