Chief magistrate Phiroze Neemuchwala emphasized the severity of the case, stating, 'This was an extremely long time and is very troubling for the well-being of the child.'
The court found the mother guilty under Section 444 of the Education Act 1996, highlighting her failure to ensure her child's regular school attendance, a legal offense.
Despite facing charges due to her child's absence from school for over seven months, the mother did not attend her court hearing, leading to the case being proved in her absence.
The mother was fined 120, including a surcharge, with the payment plan allowing her to pay 20 a month for six months, starting in 28 days.
Collection
[
|
...
]