In an 82-page court filing, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg asserts that Donald Trump’s "history of malicious conduct" justifies the continuation of his hush-money case, despite Trump's attempts to dismiss it.
Bragg firmly rebuts Trump’s argument for presidential-elect immunity, stating that there are no grounds for relief as the concept does not exist, particularly in conjunction with Trump’s ongoing legal challenges.
The Manhattan jury's unanimous conviction of Trump highlights the serious nature of his actions, as Bragg notes that Trump conspired to promote his own election unlawfully by making a hush-money payment before the election.
Legal experts believe that even if Trump receives a jail sentence for his convictions, as a first-time offender, it's unlikely he would serve any actual time in jail, especially at 78 years of age.
Collection
[
|
...
]