Lewis highlighted the Post's commitment to not endorse a candidate, invoking its historical stance during the 1960 Nixon-Kennedy race as a guiding principle.
As editorial dissent grows, the Post's union has expressed serious concerns about this decision's timing and its implications for journalistic integrity just days before a critical election.
In a twist, the column indicated a belief that this non-endorsement might be interpreted in various ways, yet asserted it reflects the paper's core values of character and courage.
This incident aligns with The Los Angeles Times' similar situation, showcasing a troubling trend of editorial independence being curtailed by ownership decisions.
Collection
[
|
...
]