Raymond Lee Oyler, sentenced to death for the 2006 Esperanza fire that killed five firefighters, is challenging his convictions based on a 2019 California law redefining murder. His attorney, Michael W. Clough, argued that under the new law, Oyler's actions do not qualify him as the 'actual killer' necessary for murder convictions, suggesting a more stringent requirement for physical involvement. The case highlights complexities in arson laws and the implications of retroactive legal changes, as Oyler continues to deny responsibility for the fatal fire.
Under the 2019 law, which is retroactive, only what it calls the actual killer can be convicted of murder. A getaway driver in a liquor store robbery in which an accomplice killed a clerk might no longer face a murder charge, for instance.
When you are talking about starting a wildfire arson, there are a number of things that may enter into the two calculations I think you have to make.
Oyler’s attorney asserts he did not meet the current legal definition of "actual killer," which may lead to overturning his convictions.
Oyler was accused of setting 23 fires and denied responsibility for the Esperanza fire that resulted in five firefighter deaths.
Collection
[
|
...
]