The article discusses the challenges of communication in a polarized society, highlighting how defensiveness and emotional suppression hinder meaningful dialogue. It uses a real-life example from a local magazine's comment section to show how quickly conversations can deteriorate when participants deny their emotions. The piece also reflects on political discourse, notably an exchange between Congress members, demonstrating that feelings are often ridiculed rather than acknowledged. The author argues that recognizing and addressing emotions can lead to more productive conversations and a greater chance of finding common ground.
AOC moved to take down MTG's insult in a congressional session, and MTG responded, "Are your feelings hurt?" All along the political spectrum, I've seen similar sentiments.
Reactivity and defensiveness drive conversations online and in real life alike, making it harder to find common ground even when it is there.
Collection
[
|
...
]