The article explores the challenges in diagnosing personality disorders due to the existence of multiple competing systems. Each system has its internal rules but cannot be combined, leading to confusion among the public and professionals alike. For instance, the DSM-5 focuses on observable behaviors, which may oversimplify the complexities of personality disorders. In contrast, other systems, such as Masterson's, consider a broader psychological context. The need for clarity in communication regarding the diagnostic system in use is emphasized, as misunderstandings can arise when different frameworks are referenced.
The DSM-5, designed for ease of use by untrained medical professionals, focuses on observable behaviors, neglecting clients' underlying motives which could inform diagnosis.
Different diagnostic systems for personality disorders, while each consistent within themselves, create confusion for the public due to their incompatibility with others.
Collection
[
|
...
]