Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's lawsuit against Dr. May C. Lau accuses her of violating the state's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, claiming unlawful prescriptions using false diagnoses. This groundbreaking suit raises significant questions about medical ethics and legal repercussions in providing gender-affirming care.
The medications prescribed by Dr. Lau have been utilized for decades among children, both for medical treatments in cisgender individuals and for gender transition purposes. This counters Paxton's portrayal of gender-affirming care as 'dangerous and experimental', underscoring the established safety and effectiveness of such treatments endorsed by major medical associations.
Paxton's claims that there is 'no scientific evidence' supporting the benefits of gender-affirming medications stand in stark contrast to the recommendations of prominent American medical associations, which advocate for gender-affirming care as essential for the well-being and health of transgender people.
Following the Texas Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the gender-affirming care ban, which was supported by a political majority, the U.S. Department of Justice's stance against similar legislation in Tennessee highlights a growing national divide on issues surrounding trans rights and medical care.
Collection
[
|
...
]