The recent meta-analysis on fluoride exposure raises concerns, revealing 70% of the studies analyzed carried a high risk of bias, undermining its findings.
This controversial study, published in JAMA Pediatrics, links high fluoride levels to lower IQs in children, but relies on predominantly low-quality studies from outside the US.
Peer-review of the fluoride study highlighted significant methodological flaws, including biased study selection and insufficient evaluation of potential confounding variables.
Despite ongoing research since 2015, the fluoride analysis was rejected twice by independent experts due to major deficiencies in statistical rigor and data transparency.
Collection
[
|
...
]