The 'New York Times' is so, so stupid for killing its kids section
Briefly

The 'New York Times' is so, so stupid for killing its kids section
"We have new priorities now that force us to make some tough decisions about where to commit resources," says New York Times Magazine editor-in-chief Jake Silverstein."
"You should have a story about slime."
"'That wasn't the point of a kids section-to create a place in the Times to publish children-but [it was a goal to] have kids voices in every issue and story,' says Roper. 'For a story about flooding, we'd interview young people affected by the flood.'"
The New York Times for Kids published its final monthly insert after eight years and nearly 100 issues. The company made $455 million in profit last year, but the Kids insert was closed and its remaining staff reassigned within the company. The decision reflects a shift of resources toward the New York Times Magazine and an expanded digital presence. The Kids section featured international news, how-tos, style, large illustrations, and a commitment to including young voices in reporting. The closure drew criticism for eliminating a tangible, analogue resource at a time when parents seek unplugged content for children.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]