"As digital nonsense and lies swamp us every day, and tech billionaires in foreign countries decide what we see and hear, there is a stronger case than ever for British content and for journalism that serves the people of the UK with some of those old-fashioned things such as honesty, accuracy and truth. Despite all the attacks upon it, and the whippings it administers to itself, the BBC is the country's most trusted broadcaster."
"Some of its travails have been because sometimes it hasn't been good enough. Its journalism is required by royal charter to be of a higher quality and more distinctive than the market alone can provide; and that isn't consistently the case. It has fallen for rookie errors the failure to identify the family of the narrator of a documentary about Gaza, the indefensible editing of Trump that suggest a lack of managerial grip."
The BBC has endured multiple crises that produced high-profile resignations following editorial failures and historic scandals. External critics have seized on recent mistakes to intensify attacks, while technological platforms amplify misinformation and challenge public-interest media. Strong arguments exist for sustaining British journalism that prioritises honesty, accuracy and truth to serve the UK. The BBC's reach and universality drive both trust and hostility. Internal shortcomings include inconsistent excellence, editorial lapses such as mistaken identification and misleading editing, and a susceptibility to marketing-driven, low-quality output. The organisation faces the dual tasks of defending its public service role and improving managerial and editorial standards.
Read at www.theguardian.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]