Is the Law for Suckers, Now?
Briefly

Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern discuss the challenges of legal journalism in the Trump era, questioning the relevance and reverence for law amidst apparent lawlessness.
The debate centers on whether legal journalists should persist in adhering to legal principals or adapt their reporting to reflect a more complex, chaotic reality.
Lithwick refers to a heated debate about the upcoming Trump era, confronting the validity of law when faced with actions that challenge its sanctity and application.
Stern expresses concern that simply stating something is illegal, as done in the past, may not be sufficient in a landscape where the law feels disregarded.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]