"CNN anchor Erica Hill was taken aback when a guest told her he understood what Megyn Kelly was trying to do when she dissected sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein's pedophilia, or lack thereof. Kelly has gone viral over a two-minute segment during which she argued that Epstein was not a pedophile, expanding on what an unnamed confidant told her. While describing Epstein as sick and disgusting, she still explored the difference between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old claiming Epstein was into the barely-legal type."
"ERICA HILL: I just want to start where the where those Megyn Kelly comments. She did add, all of this is disgusting. I have to be honest, I'm not sure what adding that changes. The thought of it and the thought of this person who she's discussing somehow seeming to make the case that it's OK if a girl is 15 versus eight. Bradley, why even raise that point?"
Erica Hill played a viral two-minute Megyn Kelly segment in which Kelly argued that Jeffrey Epstein was not a pedophile and relayed an unnamed confidant's perspective. Kelly described Epstein as sick and disgusting while exploring distinctions between a 15-year-old and a 5-year-old, suggesting Epstein favored 'barely-legal' victims. Panelist Bradley Devlin said he understood what Kelly was trying to do, prompting Hill to interrupt and question the point of making such distinctions. Devlin compared Kelly's comments to a comedian's bit about medical distinctions and cautioned that mentioning them makes one sound like a creep. The exchange underscored confusion and outrage.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]