"I don't normally waste my time reading editorial pages because I don't care what about six guys sitting in a skyscraper have to say about anything. The fact of the matter is this: we wouldn't be where we are today but for the fact that this president did something no president has done in half a century."
"We're not putting up with that anymore. They're spreading terrorism all over the world. They tried to assassinate me. We're not putting up with that anymore, we're going to take care of this once and for all."
"My envoy came back, Steve Witkoff, he said they were bragging about the fact that they could have 11 nuclear bombs in 10 days. And I'm supposed to listen to Chuck Schumer?"
Mark Levin criticized The Wall Street Journal's editorial on President Trump's handling of Iran, asserting that Trump's actions were necessary to address nuclear threats. Levin dismissed the editorial's concerns about inconsistent rhetoric and premature victory claims, arguing that Trump's approach was unprecedented and essential for national security. He emphasized that Iran's nuclear ambitions and support for terrorism posed significant risks, and he rejected the notion of delaying action on these issues. Levin expressed disdain for the opinions of editorial writers, focusing instead on the tangible results of Trump's policies.
Read at www.mediaite.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]