"The BBC is facing an unprecedented crisis over the controversial editing of a speech by U.S. President Donald Trump in a documentary broadcast a year ago. The incident has profoundly impacted trust in the professional ethics of the prestigious British corporation, as well as journalistic practice in general. The resignation of the BBC's director-general, Tim Davie, and the head of the news division, Deborah Turness,"
"the earthquake shaking the foundations of an institution whose founding principles stipulate its commitment to public service. The debate surrounding the editing of Trump's speech in the hours leading up to the January 6, 2021, riots at the U.S. Capitol raises the stakes for the BBC's most crucial intangible asset: its credibility. Resolving this requires determining whether it was genuinely a disastrous lapse in judgment or a deliberate manipulation."
"For Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, professor of communication at the University of Copenhagen and former director of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at Oxford University, the editing of the Panorama program that sparked the scandal is the kind of issue that worries those who fear that journalism can sometimes become a form of disinformation. Rasmus Kleis Nielsen: An example that will endure Professor Nielsen has spent years researching the current state of journalism and the challenges it faces,"
The BBC faces a major crisis after controversial editing of a speech by Donald Trump in a documentary, which has eroded trust in the corporation's professional ethics and journalistic practice. Senior executives Tim Davie and Deborah Turness resigned as ultimately responsible for an error of judgment, yet the scandal continues to undermine institutional foundations and public service commitments. The controversy centers on whether the edit was a disastrous lapse or deliberate manipulation, since the altered sequence created a substantially misleading representation of what Trump actually said. The incident intensifies scrutiny of journalism's vulnerability to disinformation and reputational harm.
Read at english.elpais.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]