"Instead, they need involvement, critical feedback, context, suggestions of other papers to look at, deep analysis and more. To draw a comparison with ac"
A four-day conference in Pretoria focused on how to cover misconduct in science, including fraud and peer review problems. Participation came from investigative work into problematic COVID-19 papers and misconduct, using a scientific background. The experience showed that media coverage issues often stem from practices within the scientific community. Limited direct engagement with journalists can lead to authors receiving an easier media ride. Journalists emphasized that they need more than quick quotes; they require scientists to be available for deeper analysis, context, critical feedback, and suggestions of related papers. Stronger collaboration could improve investigative reporting and the effectiveness of scientific sleuthing efforts.
#science-journalism #research-misconduct #covid-19-peer-review #investigative-reporting #collaboration
Read at Nature
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]