General Catalyst posted VC rage bait and it worked, especially on a16z | TechCrunch
Briefly

General Catalyst posted VC rage bait and it worked, especially on a16z | TechCrunch
"GC asks VC about his robotic dog. VC explains "This is Woof AI" and then extols the virtues of the artificial companion (you don't need to walk it or break the news to the kids when it dies!) and declares "you'll never want a real dog after this." VC mentions that his firm is leading the seed round and pitches GC to join the cap table."
"GC explains how people like real dogs and remarks, "I'd love to hear more, but we actually have a really high bar around responsibility for these things." Then VC kicks the AI dog and the dog chases him off the screen. The post has now been viewed 2.4 million times with hundreds of shares and comments, and thousands of likes."
"The VC was played by a tall actor in a baggy shirt and vest with a distinctly large, bald head - an apparent dig at Andreessen Horowitz co-founder Marc Andreessen. (But the real Andreessen never looks that disheveled). The GC character was played by a man with a thick head of dark hair, white kicks and a tendency to stare deeply into the camera."
"I'd have to read so far between the lines that I'd be off the page and peering into another book to unpack this, but I'll try anyway. The message, roughly: other VCs, and a16z in particular, will fund anything. GC won't. (I asked about this. GC hasn't responded.)"
A parody video on X frames a “VC vs GC” matchup using Mac vs. PC-style characters. The VC character promotes Woof AI, describing an artificial robotic dog that eliminates walking and the need to break news when it dies. The VC claims people will never want a real dog after it. The GC character responds that real dogs are preferred and sets a high standard for responsibility regarding such products. The VC then kicks the AI dog, which chases him off screen. The post gained millions of views, extensive engagement, and sparked commentary about differences in how venture firms fund controversial or high-risk companies.
Read at TechCrunch
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]