"The verdict comes at a time of growing friction between the police and the UK's significant Palestine solidarity movement and before another march that could bring new tensions."
"Both defendants clearly knew the conditions, given their organising roles and involvement in planning the demonstration, read the judges' summary of the trial."
"Mr Jamal's speech constituted incitement: It was a suggestion, persuasion and inducement encouraging breach of the conditions, it added."
"Our right to protest is precious, and is undermined by this decision, but the fight is not over."
Ben Jamal and Chris Nineham were found guilty of breaching protest guidelines during a pro-Palestine demonstration in London. The verdict reflects rising tensions between police and the Palestine solidarity movement. Both leaders were charged for failing to comply with designated protest areas and inciting others to breach conditions. The trial highlighted the police's restrictions on the protest, citing safety concerns. Supporters, including Jeremy Corbyn, attended the trial, and Jamal's organization vowed to continue fighting for the right to protest despite the court's decision.
Read at www.aljazeera.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]