Gaetz challenged Durham's findings by suggesting that the investigation's failure to address the key questions regarding Mifsud's actions was indicative of a lack of genuine inquiry.
Durham's testimony concluded that while Russia's interference merited investigation, he criticized the investigative methods used, raising questions about the legitimacy of the claims made against Trump.
The exchange revealed a tactical maneuver by the Republicans to control the narrative post-testimony, allowing them to assert their viewpoints without immediate Democratic rebuttal.
Gaetz's emphasis on the flaws in the investigation questioned Durham’s credibility as he implied that the ongoing inquiries merely reiterated previous criticisms rather than offering new insights.
Collection
[
|
...
]