The omission of LGBTQ+ rights from the vice presidential debate sparked frustration among advocates, particularly given the rise of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation now present in over 25 states.
Sen. Katie Britt emphasized that support for Vance stemmed from his authenticity and leadership, but when addressing transgender issues, she framed the debate as being about 'fairness and safety,' not discrimination.
When pressed about the legitimacy of the 2020 election, Vance avoided the question, instead diverting the discussion to grievances and accusing others of silencing dissent, which Walz labeled a 'damning non-answer.'
Despite the candidates focusing on pressing topics like the economy and national security, the absence of LGBTQ+ discussions raised concerns among advocates about the visibility and representation of these issues in current politics.
Collection
[
|
...
]