President Biden is being urged to OK a plan allowing retired pilots from the NATO alliance and the US to fly Ukraine's newly acquired F-16 fighter jets. This step is critical as it directly supports Ukraine's capacity to counter Russian aggression with more sophisticated air power. The need for such action stems from Ukraine's current limitations in adequately defending itself against ongoing threats and is a pivotal moment for US involvement in bolstering Ukraine's military capabilities.
Jonathan Sweet and Mark Toth argue that President Biden fails to grasp that Ukraine will never prevail without the ability to effectively strike back. They assert that U.S. and NATO restrictions must be loosened, allowing Kyiv to target Russian threats regardless of location, making it essential for the United States to grant Ukraine the military support needed for self-defense. The article also highlights the idea that Biden's hesitation only serves to empower Russia.
The article emphasizes that Zelensky has a solid strategy for winning the war against Russia, which he plans to present at the upcoming UN General Assembly. The challenge lies in whether the Washington establishment is willing to support his plan and overcome bureaucratic inertia. This serves as a reminder of the urgency for collaborative and decisive action, indicating that Ukraine’s success is contingent on timely responses from allies.
In the context of U.S. politics, the article discusses the unexpected bipartisan success surrounding the TikTok ban, suggesting that a similar approach could be beneficial for addressing high-stakes issues like Ukraine. The creation of select committees has proven effective in pushing forward critical legislative agendas, which could be replicated to unite support behind Ukraine's military needs and ensure decisive actions are taken in its favor.
Collection
[
|
...
]