The article critiques Robert Kuttner's claim that Trump should emulate Hitler regarding NIH funding, labeling such comparisons as deranged. Critics argue that this line of thought is not only absurd but undermines legitimate discussions about public funding for science. Additionally, Ben Rhodes is chastised for his view that voters did not elect Trump to implement major governmental reforms. The piece asserts that Trump's decisive approach to slashing perceived waste and thinking ambitiously is fundamentally why he has garnered significant support. Lastly, it emphasizes that a visible president is beneficial for public engagement.
In this sociopathic piece, Robert Kuttner slams the Trump team for capping overhead costs for NIH research grants, arguing that "even the Führer knew to support German science."
Rhodes, President Barack Obama's pet foreign-policy visionary, complains in The New York Times that Trump supporters didn't put him in office to do things like dismantle USAID or buy Greenland.
It's normal and good for voters to see and hear from their president regularly. As for constantly thinking about Trump, that's a di...
Collection
[
|
...
]