The White House was not only displeased but also implied that Netanyahu's public stance did not align with the diplomatic communications that had taken place, which could suggest a breakdown in transparency.
During a follow-up meeting, Secretary of State Antony Blinken asserted the importance of a diplomatic agreement for a ceasefire, reinforcing the U.S. commitment to finding a peaceful resolution.
Netanyahu's office eventually acknowledged U.S. coordination regarding the ceasefire proposal, moving towards a narrative that aligns more closely with Washington's expectations.
The political pressure stemming from Netanyahu’s coalition partners appears to have significantly influenced his messaging on the ceasefire proposal, sparking confusion in international communications.
Collection
[
|
...
]