Harvard University is positioned as a leader in resisting federal government interference, particularly in relation to its handling of antisemitism on campus. An article in The New York Times emphasizes Harvard's refusal to accept pressure from the Trump administration, showcasing a conflict between academic independence and federal authority. Critics argue that Harvard's defense of student protests, even those marked by antisemitism, undermines Jewish students' rights, while the university maintains that its actions reflect a commitment to constitutional protections. The ensuing debate highlights a larger cultural and political divide within the United States.
In this case, Harvard and its defenders act as if antisemitic campus rallies are a civil right for the school instead of a violation of Jewish students' civil rights!
The Gray Lady has appointed Harvard to the job. Bring it on! In an article that hails the Ivy League school's rejection of any White House penalties over eruptions of antisemitism on its campus.
Collection
[
|
...
]