How Democrats' efforts to retool their message have become cartoonish
Briefly

The article critiques the current state of the Democratic Party amidst global and domestic tensions. It highlights the internal strife, particularly between established politicians and progressive newcomers like AOC and David Hogg. The author notes the party's failure to resonate with voters, pointing out that dissatisfaction stems not from messaging but from the perceived toxicity of their agenda. The piece also questions the Democrats' economic predictions amid tariff discussions, suggesting a miscalculation that could further alienate voters. Overall, it portrays a party at odds with itself and the electorate, similar to the bumbling character Elmer Fudd.
Democrats don't understand why their brand is toxic, with only 1 in 5 voters approving of Congressional Democrats, revealing a disconnect with public sentiment.
In a self-defeating cycle, Democrats are caught in a battle over messaging and identity politics, alienating potential voters and undermining their own candidates.
Despite predictions of economic doom due to tariffs, the economy has proven resilient, challenging the Democrats' narrative and exposing their miscalculations.
The rivalry within the Democratic Party highlights a lack of consensus and direction, with key figures targeting each other rather than addressing broader voter concerns.
Read at New York Post
[
|
]