Attorneys from the Women's Law Project filed an amicus curiae brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, highlighting flaws in the ruling.
The brief argues that the Dobbs decision has disrupted obstetrical and gynecological care beyond abortion, resulting in denial of essential medical services in emergency situations.
The Dobbs ruling not only affects abortion rights but raises constitutional concerns on federalism, preemption, and federal executive power, according to Susan J. Frietsche.
Frietsche emphasized the negative impact of misapplied state abortion laws on obstetrical emergencies, leading to heartbreaking stories and reflecting an unworkable rule in the Dobbs decision.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]