The court's decision means that the merits of his lawsuit will be determined in a court battle with the school. While it does not decide the outcome, it allows the circumstantial evidence of discrimination based on religion to be explored further in lower court proceedings.
He offered to provide a 'Christian perspective' to the play, expressing concerns about how the Christian religion is portrayed and the 'unsavory opinions' attributed to Christian leaders in the production.
McNellis stated, 'As a Christian I would love to collaborate with your project. Please let me know if the love that Jesus can provide will help your play.' This reflects his desire to engage while defending his beliefs.
The unanimous panel of three judges commented, 'We conclude Mr. McNellis has alleged facts that, from circumstantial evidence, give rise to a reasonable inference of discrimination based on his religion,' highlighting the legal complexities surrounding religious expression in schools.
Collection
[
|
...
]