Elie Honig's column, while critical of Jack Smith's timing for filing before the election, overlooks significant developments in the January 6 investigation that contradicts his previous claims.
Speculation suggests that Jack Smith may have refrained from certain actions regarding Trump’s indictment due to DOJ policies against major legal movements close to elections.
The DOJ's recent consultation with other components regarding the Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. United States indicates they are proceeding cautiously and deliberately.
Jack Smith’s request for an extension highlighted a focus on consulting other DOJ parts rather than presenting new evidence, illustrative of the ongoing legal process.
Collection
[
|
...
]