The OpenAI lawsuit became a master class in what not to put in writing

A jury decision and a judge’s ruling in a lawsuit involving Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and OpenAI also revealed damaging details about prominent AI leaders. Communications and personal materials surfaced publicly, including threatening texts, diary entries about becoming a billionaire, and anxious messages during boardroom turmoil. The trial showed that years of emails, texts, Slack messages, and private notes were aired in ways that undermined carefully managed public images. The outcome reinforced that nothing is ever private, especially when corporate messaging platforms are used for jokes, venting, or sarcastic exchanges. Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella faced fewer embarrassing disclosures, partly because he was less likely to commit thoughts to writing.

"Whether it was Musk's combative texts to Altman threatening to make "[Altman and Brockman] the most hated men in America" if OpenAI refused to settle, co-defendant Greg Brockman's painfully earnest diary entries about becoming a billionaire ("Financially, what will take me to $1B?"), or Mira Murati's anxious messages to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella as OpenAI's boardroom coup unraveled, executives who had spent years projecting total control were revealed to be far more human, and far messier, than they intended. (Microsoft owns a 27% stake in OpenAI.)"

"The case was "a reminder that discovery can be the real trial. In this case, hundreds of emails, texts, Slack messages, and private diary entries from years back were aired publicly and often unflatteringly," says Sarah Kreps, director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University."

"For executives watching from boardrooms, and perhaps even for some sitting in the courtroom itself, the takeaway was straightforward: Nothing is ever private. Lawyers and HR executives have long warned against treating corporate messaging platforms as places to joke, vent, or trade sarcastic barbs.That lesson played out repeatedly during the trial."

"Among the central figures, Nadella largely escaped the most embarrassing disclosures, thanks in part to his reluctance to commit thoughts to writing. Documents introduced at trial showed him to be comparatively restrained and opaque, even in internal discussions over replacing (and ultimately reinstating) Altman. Nadella's relative silence suggested a lesson others in the industry may have ignored: it is often safer to pick"

Read at Fast Company