The article discusses the controversy surrounding Elon Musk's DOGE audit and the subsequent temporary restraining order by Judge Paul Engelmayer. Critics claim that if DOGE were a legitimate audit, it wouldn't pose any issues with a short delay. Instead, Musk's team reacts defensively, raising questions about the audit's integrity. The piece highlights Musk’s history of manipulating judicial proceedings and indicates that the uproar is likely a tactic to intimidate Judge Vargas, who will hear the case next.
"If DOGE were conducting a good faith audit... why would this order be controversial? Audits don't collapse if they wait another week into a four-year term."
"Musk keeps insisting DOGE is just an innocent audit to expose corruption, yet the resistance to compliance suggests otherwise."
Collection
[
|
...
]