Judge Amul Thapar criticized the lack of Originalist teaching in law schools, arguing that neglecting this perspective ultimately harms students' understanding of law from a historical context.
Thapar advocates for a diverse faculty in law schools and has suggested that donors ought to withhold support from institutions that do not align with these ideological preferences.
Despite promoting Originalism, Thapar's views expose a hypocrisy wherein judicial interpretations often disregard historical context to achieve politically desired outcomes.
This attempt by Republican judges to influence legal education marks a significant departure from previous bipartisan norms, employing boycotts and pressure as tools of political control.
Collection
[
|
...
]