The article discusses the role of per diem lawyers in court appearances, especially in high-volume practices. It highlights a personal experience where a per diem lawyer handled oral arguments in a complex case, raising concerns about their preparedness and understanding of the intricate details involved. The piece questions the appropriateness of using per diem attorneys for nuanced tasks and emphasizes the importance of having knowledgeable representation during critical stages like oral arguments, suggesting that logistical considerations can undermine quality advocacy for clients.
In high-volume legal practices, per diem lawyers provide flexibility for court appearances; however, their lack of familiarity with complex cases can affect representation quality.
While per diem lawyers are useful in simple matters, their performance in nuanced oral arguments is questionable, raising concerns about client advocacy.
The use of per diem lawyers often raises questions about preparedness and effectiveness, especially when they lack firsthand knowledge of the intricacies of a case.
The decision to send a per diem lawyer to oral arguments may prioritize logistics over quality, potentially undermining the representation received by the client.
Collection
[
|
...
]