"Meta Platforms Inc. convinced a federal appeals court to certify a question about whether its terms of service and community standards created an obligation for the company to combat scam advertisements. Whether the terms of service and community standards impose a legally enforceable obligation on Meta is a question with substantial grounds for differing opinions, the US District Court for the Northern District of California said Thursday."
"Plaintiffs Christopher Calise sued the social media giant for soliciting and assisting scammers that were placing deceptive and fraudulent advertisements on Facebook. The proposed class action said the terms of service created a ..."
Meta Platforms persuaded a federal appeals court to certify a legal question about whether its terms of service and community standards created an obligation for the company to combat scam advertisements. The US District Court for the Northern District of California found that whether those policies impose a legally enforceable obligation on Meta presents substantial grounds for differing opinions. Plaintiff Christopher Calise filed a proposed class action alleging that Meta solicited and assisted scammers who placed deceptive and fraudulent advertisements on Facebook. The proposed class action contended that the terms of service and community standards could create enforceable obligations for the company.
Read at Bloomberglaw
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]