"Jurors found that Meta made false or misleading statements and engaged in 'unconscionable' trade practices that took advantage of children's vulnerabilities. They agreed on thousands of violations, each counting separately toward a penalty of $375 million."
"Juror Linda Payton stated that the jury reached a compromise on the estimated number of teenagers affected by Meta's platforms, opting for the maximum penalty per violation, believing each child was worth the maximum amount."
A New Mexico jury ruled that Meta knowingly harmed children's mental health and concealed information regarding child sexual exploitation on its platforms. The jury sided with state prosecutors, asserting that Meta prioritized profits over safety and violated the state's Unfair Practices Act. They found thousands of violations, leading to a penalty of $375 million. Although the verdict was significant, it will not immediately force Meta to change its practices, as a judge will determine further actions in a subsequent trial phase.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]