Clement Vallandigham demonstrated zealous advocacy to the extreme, ultimately costing him his life but successfully defending his client who was acquitted in a murder case.
A federal judge ordered lawyers to apologize to Philadelphia residents for waking them with a loud recording, raising questions about the limits of zealous lawyering.
The attorneys represented Termaine Hicks, arguing he was wrongfully framed, and effectively demonstrated their point with a loud recording, leading to the judge's unusual ruling.
The judge's decision highlights the ethical boundaries lawyers must navigate between effective advocacy and causing unnecessary disruption to the community.
Collection
[
|
...
]