Jonathan Turley has shifted from criticizing combative rhetoric to endorsing Trump at the expense of legal integrity, masking partisanship as legitimate analysis. His motives raise concern.
The 'legitimate' grievances Trump harbors against the DOJ reflect an ingrained mistrust, particularly regarding investigations that threaten loyalty rather than uphold justice. Turley's rationale seems more about ideological alignment.
In defending Trump's actions, Turley manages to frame controversial moves as legitimate maneuvers, softening the blow of serious allegations while catering to an audience eager for grievance.
Turley's portrayal of Trump's selection of Matt Gaetz demonstrates a willingness to overlook experience for loyalty, ultimately reinforcing a narrative that prioritizes partisan allegiance over legal standards.
Collection
[
|
...
]