"Only 37% of legal leaders trust the use of generative artificial intelligence in high-stakes decisions, showing limited confidence in its ability to interpret complex issues, according to a new study of 500 legal and business leaders. The study by Paragon Legal, a legal services company that advises businesses and corporate legal departments, also reveals that: * 39% say their organizations are adopting AI too quickly. * 36% have used AI-generated insights that they do not fully trust. * 37% have restricted or disabled AI tools because of concerns over compliance."
""As artificial intelligence becomes more deeply integrated into legal practice, leaders are increasingly navigating where to draw the line between innovation and integrity," according to the study. "Trust in AI remains cautious, especially when human judgment and accountability are at stake." Nearly two-thirds (65%) of legal and business leaders who responded to the survey say AI should be used for legal support, rather than attorney-led decisions. However, the study also shows that 41% admit that they have reclassified tasks to assist with AI adoption."
Only 37% of legal leaders trust generative artificial intelligence for high-stakes decisions, reflecting limited confidence in AI's interpretation of complex legal issues. Thirty-nine percent believe their organizations are adopting AI too quickly, and 36% have used AI-generated insights they do not fully trust. Thirty-seven percent have restricted or disabled AI tools over compliance concerns. Sixty-five percent think AI should support legal work rather than replace attorney-led decisions, and 41% have reclassified tasks to aid AI adoption. A key recommendation is to establish clear accountability frameworks and retain human sign-off where regulatory interpretation or client impact is involved.
Read at ABA Journal
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]