How Appealing Weekly Roundup - Above the Law
Briefly

How Appealing Weekly Roundup - Above the Law
"Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog, the Web's first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing. "A Senators-Only Right to Sue in Shutdown Deal; In their legislation reopening the government, senators awarded themselves a legal power to sue the government that should be universal": Anya Bidwell and Patrick Jaicomo have this essay online at The Wall Street Journal. "Judging The Justice System In The Age Of Trump: Nancy Gertner." You can access the new episode of David Lat's "Original Jurisdiction" podcast via this link. "Gorsuch Joins Sotomayor as Supreme Court Children's Author": Justin Wise of Bloomberg Law has this report."
""Justice Dept. Struggled to Find Lawyers to Handle Maurene Comey Suit; Ms. Comey, the daughter of the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, sued the Trump administration after she was abruptly fired; Now the U.S. attorney in Albany has agreed to take the case": Jonah E. Bromwich and William K. Rashbaum of The New York Times have this report. "Abortion Has Remained Mostly Accessible. That May Soon Change." The New York Times has published this editorial. "The Supreme Court Just Took a Scary Voting Case That Has Trump Salivating. He Might Be Disappointed." Law professor Richard L. Hasen has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate."
Senators were awarded a senators-only legal power to sue the government in legislation reopening the government. A podcast episode features Nancy Gertner discussing the justice system in the Trump era. Justice Neil Gorsuch joined Justice Sonia Sotomayor as an author of children's books. The Justice Department struggled to find lawyers to handle Maurene Comey's suit, and the U.S. attorney in Albany agreed to take the case. The New York Times editorial warns that abortion access, which has remained mostly accessible, may soon change. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a consequential voting case analyzed by Richard Hasen.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]