The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's order due to non-existent cases generated by an AI model. Nimat Shahid challenged a divorce order from July 2022 against her husband, Sufyan Esaam. The appeals court noted that these fictitious citations were sufficient to vacate the lower court's ruling. Additionally, the court imposed a $2,500 fine on attorney Diana Lynch for relying on bogus references. Chief Justice John Roberts highlighted the necessary caution in AI usage within the judicial system.
The Georgia Court of Appeals vacated a trial court's order due to the reliance on non-existent court cases generated by an AI model, highlighting the issues of credibility in legal citations.
Judges have previously reprimanded lawyers for referencing fictitious AI-generated cases. In this instance, the appeals court decisively reversed a lower court's ruling based on erroneous citations.
Lynch's briefs to the appeals court included 11 out of 15 citations that were bogus, leading to a penalty of $2,500 for filing frivolous motions, underscoring the serious implications of AI misuse in legal contexts.
Chief Justice John Roberts advised caution regarding AI use in his Year-End Report, emphasizing the importance of verifying the credibility of references and maintaining integrity in legal processes.
Collection
[
|
...
]