Beale, during his jury instructions in Patterson's trial, reminded jurors of their pivotal role as fact-checkers while addressing potential omissions in arguments. He prepared them for deliberations, stating that only 12 of the 14 jurors would ultimately vote on the verdict. Meanwhile, Patterson's defense lawyer, Colin Mandy, criticized the prosecution's assumptions surrounding motive and intent, pointing to inconsistencies, such as the continued phone use by Patterson post-incident, and presenting medical evidence to support her innocence.
Beale emphasizes that jurors are the judges of the facts, allowing them to assess all arguments and evidence presented during the trial, despite any omissions.
Mandy highlighted the absurdity of the prosecution's claims, arguing that they lacked a clear motive and suggesting that there were no malicious intentions behind Patterson's actions.
During his defense, Mandy stressed that Patterson's phone use post-lunch contradicted the prosecution's narrative of premeditated murder, arguing against the notion of cold-blooded actions.
Mandy also pointed out Patterson's medical results, indicating she became ill from the meal, challenging the claim that she poisoned her guests.
Collection
[
|
...
]