Judge Amul Thapar argued that law schools are primarily dominated by anti-originalist professors, which undermines students' ability to understand and argue originalist legal principles effectively.
Thapar emphasized that taxpayers and donors must hold law schools accountable, suggesting that financial pressures could lead to educational reforms that would better equip students with essential legal arguments.
He criticized the current legal education system, noting the prevalence of law professors who dismiss originalist analysis as merely a cover for political motives, significantly limiting students' perspectives.
Thapar pointed out that the absence of proper training in originalism leads lawyers to miss critical arguments, potentially impacting their clients' legal outcomes positively.
Collection
[
|
...
]