The ruling is non-binding but serves as another stepping stone in the DC Disciplinary Counsel's effort to get Clark disbarred.
Rejected Clark's claim that he genuinely believed there was voter fraud and that it was ethically sufficient to cover his actions.
The case involved claims that he 'attempted to engage in conduct involving dishonesty' and 'attempted to engage in conduct that would seriously interfere with the administration of justice.'
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]