The article discusses the phenomenon of self-representation in legal proceedings, particularly in civil matters where lawyers may be unaffordable. It highlights the different treatment of pro se parties compared to represented clients, noting structural distinctions in court seating and case prioritization. For instance, pro se litigants often wait longer for their cases to be heard. The author explains that this separation may stem from practical considerations, such as preventing conflicts and ensuring that business entities are appropriately represented, but it raises questions about fairness in judicial processes.
In some courts, lawyers are instructed to sit in the jury box while pro se parties must remain in the general public area, which raises fairness concerns.
Courts may segregate lawyers and pro se parties for clarity in representation and to avoid potential conflicts, though this might seem discriminatory.
Collection
[
|
...
]