"The bill defines 'sexually oriented material' as any program, activity, literature, or material that exposes children to nude adults, individuals who are stripping, or lewd or lascivious dancing."
"Critics argue the proposal functions as both a book ban and a 'don't say trans' policy, warning it could strip funding from schools that include LGBTQ+ representation in curricula or libraries."
"California Rep. Mark Takano warned of the ramifications of the proposed bill, stating: 'When transgender students' identities are erased, and mentions of their community are censured by Congressional mandate, their education—and wellbeing—are needlessly put at risk.'"
"Despite claims that the bill is necessary to prevent inappropriate performances, its sponsor, Mary Miller, has not cited any evidence of such incidents in primary or secondary schools."
HR 7661, introduced by Mary Miller, seeks to prohibit federal education funding for what it defines as 'sexually oriented material' in schools. This includes content related to gender dysphoria and transgenderism, effectively categorizing LGBTQ+ topics as inappropriate. The bill has passed the House Committee on Education & Workforce along party lines, rejecting amendments to protect lessons on various important subjects. Critics warn it acts as a book ban and could harm transgender students by erasing their identities from educational content.
Read at PinkNews | Latest lesbian, gay, bi and trans news | LGBTQ+ news
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]