""It is not irrational for a legislature to encourage citizens 'to appreciate their sex' and not 'become disdainful of their sex' by refusing to fund experimental procedures that may have the opposite effect," the three-judge panel wrote in its unanimous decision."
""Today's ruling makes clear that states have the authority to set reasonable limits within taxpayer-funded healthcare programs," Gov. Morrisey said in March."
The Supreme Court's Skrmetti decision has prompted significant legal changes regarding gender-affirming care. A U.S. appeals court upheld West Virginia's ban on Medicaid funding for such care, citing the Supreme Court's reasoning. The 4th Circuit Court ruled that the ban does not discriminate against a protected class. West Virginia's governor supported the ruling, emphasizing state authority over healthcare funding. Eleven states have enacted similar bans, reflecting a broader trend in limiting gender-affirming care access for trans individuals.
Read at LGBTQ Nation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]