According to Kevin Acee of the San Diego Union-Tribune, the play was perfectly legal because runners can create their own path until a throw is made. Machado was heading back toward the bag when the ball struck him. This nuance in the rules sparked debate as Dodger players voiced their concerns, particularly feeling it should have been called interference given that Machado’s actions appeared to affect Freeman’s throw.
Dodgers shortstop Miguel Rojas felt the play should've been called an out in favor of the Dodgers. Rojas explained, 'I was talking to the umpire, but he told me that he wasn't looking at the runner. He was looking at the play at second base.' This illustrates the complexities involved in umpiring such moments in the heat of the game.
Freeman, however, mentioned that they're coached to do the exact same thing during spring training, indicating that the Dodgers also employ similar tactics. This highlights how strategic nuances can significantly influence game dynamics, and perhaps this disagreement stems from differing team philosophies on field play.
Roberts, regarding the play, stated, 'You can't appeal it. And the thing is, from my vantage point, it's not a reviewable play.' This comment points out the limitations of current baseball rules and the frustration that can arise from those situations.
Collection
[
|
...
]