The article discusses the Final Four's composition, noting that seven out of eight teams are top seeds, which raises questions about the excitement of March Madness. It emphasizes the tension between expected outcomes and chaotic surprises in the tournament, reflecting on the balance of skill and youthful unpredictability. Insights are provided by journalist Maitreyi Anantharaman, who shares thoughts on standout players like Paige Bueckers and explores team dynamics. The article ultimately examines whether the tournament retains its appeal amid less chaos and predictable outcomes.
It is a fact that seven of the eight teams in the men's and women's Final Four were the top seeds in their respective brackets.
Does the ideal state of March Madness depend upon a certain baseline level of chaos, or is it just enough to watch a bunch of college basketball?
This meant a visit to the Milaysia Fulwiley appreciation station, answering questions about how weird people will be about Paige Bueckers.
March Madness can still be fun when it is something more like March Normalness, but a viewer's guide for players and teams is essential.
Collection
[
|
...
]